Professor Dalto's Sabbatical Report on the Gender Gap in Elections
Although I was interested to hear at the end of Dr. Dalto's report how the Alabama population differs from the population in the rest of the United States, I would like to emphasize a couple of things he said about gender stereotypes. First, he said that although men have more testosterone and women more estrogen, which might lead us to believe men to be more aggressive and insensitive and women to be more empathetic and nurturing, the biological hypothesis wasn't valid in his study. Second, the nurturance hypothesis, which suggests that the role of mother should lead women to be peacekeepers in the home and to support peacekeeping overseas, was also not valid in his study. Within his data set, then, neither nature nor nurture was a valid predictor in how a man or woman would vote. What implications does this finding have for the way in which we discuss masculinity and femininity, nature and nurture, in our literature class?
The "fear factor" was valid as a way to differentiate between male and female behavior, however. In both experiments and in survey results, men tended to respond to challenges and punishments with retaliation, whereas women responded with reluctance. Men externalize punishment and seek revenge, whereas women internalize violence and empathize with other victims of violence. I'd like you, if you wish, to apply this general principle to a few stories we've read. Think of the male characters in "The Man Who Was Almost a Man," "The Shoyu Kid," and A Soldier's Play. Think of the female characters in "Like That" and "The Lesson."